Home page
News
Letters
Health News
Homesearch
Regional news
Travel latest
An MP's Diary
Vox pop
Community/Village News
Business
School Report
National News
National Video News
Wedding Gallery
Back Through the Pages
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
Letters  RSS Feed RSS feed | About
Something to say? Why not e mail us at editor@andoveradvertiser.co.uk
EDITOR'S CHOICE
NEWS
Crossbow attackers terrorise families
OTHER SPORT
CINEMA
Step Brothers
GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL
Most read Comments
How can an engineer give thumbs up to megashed?

I completely agree with the sentiments expressed by Carolin Holmes and Alan Turner in their letters (Andover Advertiser 20 June) regarding the Tesco mega-shed.

A few weeks ago I looked at the plans at Test Valley Borough Council offices.

The only part I had time to read was the report by Mr Steve Jenkins senior engineer at Hampshire County Council who said, and I quote, recommend travel plans be approved.' This report was dated 19 March 2008 Mr Jenkins did suggest several amendments which altered the original plans very little, at least in my opinion.

Estimated traffic movements as follows: Daily throughput one way 35 HGVs hourly which would equate to 840 every 24 hours.

Even if this movement was limited to 12 hours there would still be 420 in 12 hours.

So far as I can see there would also be light vehicles of which there would be a considerable number.

With a total number of staff around 3,000, parking spaces for 1850 cars, 50 spaces for motorcycles (more noise) and 200 cycle stands.

Mr Jenkins suggests that 60 per cent of staff will drive in of which 15 per cent will share (optimistic I suggest) 15 per cent will use public transport and 10 per cent will walk or cycle.

When considering the effect on the environment emphasis has been on the heavy and lighter commercial vehicles.

If I am correct private cars have not been mentioned, to say nothing of noise from the cars and motor cycles.

I ask how all this stacks up vis a vis the Environment Act 1995 which lays down a legal framework for National Air Quality procedures and the Road Traffic Act 1997 which is supposed to encourage local authorities to use traffic reduction targets as a tool for reducing pollution.

I ask how can a senior engineer for the country recommend approval to this proposal?

I believe that one factor which may weigh heavily on the planning committee will be the consequence if the application is refused ie, the subject of expense of resisting an appeal, which would almost certainly be made I suspect.

If a second attempt was turned down a Government Inspector could be appointed to decide, which could be in favour of the applicants.

G Fox, Lambourne Close Thruxton.

Print   Email this
Archive
Front page'
The Andover Advertiser brings you 1000s of jobs , homes and cars every day
Powered by Powered by Fish4



Seeing stars?
See our horoscope section
Want to be a winner?
See our Leisure section
Come rain or shine
See our weather section
Are you in the picture?
See our Photo Orders
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network